We’re working with our grade 6 students to reimagine what it is like to manage living things. Traditionally in this unit we have explored different types of farming. This year we wanted to actual make a small farm. However, COVID restrictions have put a damper on some of our best wishes.
Regardless, I wanted students to really think about possible outcomes of managing living things. Singapore is unique in the fact that they are allowing meat to be grown from cells. They are marketing and working on creating clean meat. This idea that we can grow just the meat in the lab, it will prevent us from killing living things and perhaps it will be more sustainable.
The idea is very interesting and I hope motivates discussions in the classroom about what living things are and how to use them effectively. We are lucky to have Chef Kaimana who is one of the people who work with JUST come and talk to us. It’s exciting because they are rethinking traditional food and traditional ways of making and growing products.
Adding this 3d mapping element to our unit has been really interesting. One of the positive outcomes is that students are talking authentically and experimenting with the ideas of measurements. They came to real problems and tried to figure them out, it was a pretty exciting thing to watch.
Our co-teachers were excited to link in other interdisciplinary ideas. They loved the math, but also got into energy from previous units, waterways for previous years and some other social studies thinking.
When we make things, and there can be different outcomes but they focused on the same problem. Everyone seemed to really like the process, and the products have turned out better than I thought. It’s been great working with the teachers and getting to know them a lot better. I’m feeling like we can do some pretty cool stuff for the upcoming unit.
So this unit of inquiry, for our grade 6 team is one of my favourites because I love the URA City Gallery. It is easily one of my favourite spaces in Singapore, sadly it is closed during COVID, and even if it were open, we couldn’t go.
However, we are trying to learn the same sorts of things without this resource. For me, this inability to visit this place has really changed what students are learning. I was asking questions to two classes today and they really did not understand some of the aspects of Singapore’s development plan. First of all, I totally get it, why would they know these things, why does it matter to them? But I was a little sad that they missed out on some cool learning opportunities. This year we have an interesting opportunity to really build a part of the city, we are using Dover Forest Development plan as a way to think about designing a new part of the city. It seems authentic, timely and relevant, but the missed opportunity to go to the City Gallery really hurts me.
We are still trying to get out to do some demographic walks and trying to connect to different parts of our lived experience, but I really wish we could go.
My job is constantly evolving which is incredible because I always get to learn something new. This year, I think the focus is more on working as a team. Normally, I like being on my own (not just in a teaching setting) and I thrive when I can work and react quickly in my own sort of situation. By putting myself in a new situation, I hope to be able to grow more and hopefully become a better teammate.
As a classroom teacher, I normally work with the students and we come up with essential agreements. They normally can be described as communicating clearly, being aware of other people, being positive and respecting everything around us. I’m hoping to bring this idea to my new team teaching structure.
Communicating is always difficult for me, I usually know myself really well, can understand why I’m doing something, but I don’t always let people know my thought process, which can make team teaching difficult.
I am super excited to be working with my favourite teaching team mate this year. We understand each other (I think) and we have the same goals, so I’m excited to see where this heads.
I’ve been re-reading and re-wondering. Lately my research has made me question my colonial attitudes and wether a sense of place idea is overtly colonial at all. This all led me back to Raffan (1993) who talks about this idea of toponymie or how powerful it is if we name things.
At his point in my research I’m looking at interviewing my teaching partner and myself, both of us are colonial in some aspect, although from different cultures. And in Singapore both of our languages are dominant (even though neither are local). It got me to thinking how important it is to really name a place and according to who?
If naming is important, and naming can establish a sense of place, I guess I wonder who gets to name something, who can change the name, and how do those names gain power. Our colonial aspects here in Singapore have had us change names pretty frequently, and we have lost what we thought were the original names for places (from what I understand). Recently in Singapore, I feel like we have also just started acknowledging the Orang Laut people, which makes me wonder what their names for things are.
Anyway, it’s an old article but, my recent readings brought me back.
Raffan, J. (1993). The Experience of Place: Exploring Land as Teacher. ERIC Online, 16(1), 39-45
Wow, this is probably the fourth time going through all my lit review papers (well the original ones). It’s amazing what you miss or don’t pick up the first couple of times. When you really get deep into what the papers say (and not what you want them to say) there is a lot of information missing at times. Or the idea is just assumed, or it isn’t researched well enough.
It’s an interesting process, but hoping to have more written than just research notes sometime soon.
Being a place based educator is usually pretty incredible, during a pandemic there have been a few challenges.
So as a class we have started to bring some of our favourite plants indoors. This started in our civilisations unit, when we created our own civilisation that would represent us. The students, maybe picking up from me, have taken a biophillia approach to life. They love having the plants in and they started to think that plants represented our civilisation.
This led to students bringing different plants in, and now we have plants all over the classroom. It gives us a lot to think about scientifically, how much light or water do they need, how can we make things to support our plants. So far we have LED cardboard light rooms for the night for certain plants, we have different types of soil and we are experimenting with composting plant material. It’s been heaps of fun.
While there have been some challenges connecting to our community, we are doing our best to still connect to our environment.
Reading bell hooks again, it seems like when I hit a block with the dissertation research I get back into some kind of critical or feminist theory, fun times for sure.
bell hooks has been someone who has intrigued me for ages, I love reading what she has to say, but this book has been specifically intriguing.
With all the recent (or ongoing, depending on who you read I suppose) talk about anti-racist teaching, I feel like hooks has been trying to address this for decades. Most of what she feels it the antidote for racism is love.
As a classroom teacher, I think the beginning of love is understanding and empathizing. It is crucial for us as teachers to know as much about our kids as we can. The more we know, the more we can relate, the more we can understand where the students are coming from, the more, hopefully, we will be able to show genuine love.
There are some great observations in the book that make me think pretty consistently. She has asked many people (of all races and genders) how often they sit down and have informal talks with black women. Another great thought she confronts people with is, “if you could come back as any person a white male, a white female, a black male or a black female, who would you come back as?” While many people feel like they are not racist, not many people would first choose a black female (from her research anyway).
As always while reading bell hooks I have been deeply challenged about how I view the world and am reflecting about how I can work to make my classroom a little more full of love and understanding (I feel like I missed the opportunity for an Elvis Costello quotation there).
While my role has slightly shifted my focus on using place to enhance our learning has not. This unit we are looking into how artifacts can help us understand civilisations and societies. It’s pretty exciting because I’ve been telling all kinds of Singapore folk stories.
While we can’t go out to the sites, I’ve been using video, pictures and stories to connect people to the land. While most of my class (all but one) has been here for at least two years, so many students haven’t heard of any of Singapore’s stories. It’s always surprising (even though it shouldn’t be really).
So, the plan is, I’ve started with stories, pictures and video. Today we had a guest speaker who is an archaeologist video conference to tell us about the way archaeology is done here, and some of the findings they have discovered. For the next couple of weeks we will be looking at things that represent the individuals and to finish off the unit we want to think about the things that describe us as a class, here and now. I want them to be able to focus on who we are and where we are in place and time. I’m hoping we can make a little class civilisation that will focus our learning a little more as the year goes on.